Mental Capacity Articles
Deprivations of Liberty of 16- and 17-year-olds: Important new judgment from the Court of Protection
Bolton Council v KL [2022] EWCOP 24 (21 June 2022) (HHJ Hilder)Francesca Gardner and Arianna Kelly appeared in an important case from Senior Judge Hilder on how the Court of Protection should approach applications to authorise the deprivation of liberty of a 16 or 17 year old and when the streamlined procedure is appropriate. The case considered an application by the local authority to reconsider the court's removing an application for an authorisation of the deprivation of liberty of a 17-year-old who was living in a very long-standing foster care placement, where it was proposed he would remain after turning [...]
This paper discusses whether there may be room in which to revisit Cheshire West to capture (in a principled fashion) what appears to be an instinctive difference between: a. the position of a person who is confined, cannot consent to that confinement, but where there appears to be no element of coercion or the deployment of measures against their will; b. the position of person who is confined, cannot consent to that confinement, but is subject to coercion. Download below to read the full Discussion Paper. Valid Consent Discussion Paper
Sign up to Our Thinking
Sign up now to receive our latest newsletters, legal insights and information on upcoming events.


