
Profile
Commenced practice as a Barrister at the Sydney Bar in 1990, before relocating to the Melbourne Bar in 1997. Called to the Bar of England & Wales (Lincoln’s Inn) in 2005. Appointed Senior Counsel in Australia (Victoria) on 23 November 2017. Letters patent granted on 10 April 2018.
Advises and appears in cases at interlocutory, trial and appellate levels, (international law & arbitration, commercial litigation, large scale litigation, insurance, media, broadcasting & entertainment, defamation, telecommunications & information technology, sporting disputes and public & administrative law), conducted in multiple jurisdictions.
Appointed a Senior Fellow at Queen Mary University of London (School of Law), 2022 and Course Director of the LLM subject, ‘International Sports Arbitration’. Previously a Senior Fellow at the University of Melbourne (Faculty of Law), 2010-2022. Recognised internationally in Who’s Who Legal (2016-2025) as a leading lawyer in the specialty of sports law and media & entertainment and in Australia in Doyle’s Guide as a leading silk in arbitration and public and administrative law.
Holds degrees from Queensland University of Technology (LLB) and the University of Cambridge (MSt). Prior to commencing practice at the Bar, practised as a Lawyer (1986 to 1990) at: Power & Power, Brisbane; Allen Allen & Hemsley (Allens), Sydney; and Baker & McKenzie, Sydney.
Areas Of Expertise
Accepts appointments in international commercial arbitrations as both counsel and arbitrator conducted ‘ad hoc’ and before the following international arbitration panels: London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA); International Chamber of Commerce (ICC); Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) [Main Panel Member]; Asian International Arbitration Centre (AIAC, formerly KLRCA) [Panel Member]; Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre (HKIAC); Australian Centre for International Commercial Arbitration (ACICA) [Panel Member]; and the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS). Challenges to and enforcement of arbitral awards.
- Arbitration seated in Singapore and conducted under SIAC Rules: – Appointment (Sole Arbitrator) dated 27 February 2025. Sport, Contractual Dispute, Claim: approx. SGD$10M (USD$7.8M).
- Arbitration seated in Switzerland and conducted under CAS Rules: – Retained as lead Counsel. Proceedings resolved (mediation) in August 2023. Sport, Contractual dispute. Claim: GBP£200M (USD $250M).
- Arbitration seated in Malaysia and conducted under AIAC Rules: – Appointment (Sole Arbitrator) dated 5 April 2017. Proceedings resolved in June 2019: Media and Broadcasting. Claim: MYR RM472,604,114M (USD $110M).
- Arbitration seated in Australia and conducted under RIoA Rules: – Retained as Counsel. Interim Award dated 5 April 2019: Education, Intellectual Property, Licence Agreement (AUS-CHN). Injunction.
- Arbitration seated in the United Kingdom and conducted under LCIA Rules: – Retained as Counsel, May 2015. Proceedings resolved in September 2017. Telecommunications, Technology, International Trade. Claim: USD$50.0M
- Arbitration seated in Singapore and conducted under SIAC Rules: – Retained as Counsel, May 2015. Proceedings resolved in September 2017: Electronic Technology, International Trade. Claim: USD$800K
- Arbitration seated in Malaysia and conducted under KLRCA Rules: – Appointment (Sole Arbitrator) dated 15 November 2015. Final Award, 12 September 2017: Infrastructure. Claim: MYR RM5,763,363 (USD $1.349M).
- Arbitration seated in Malaysia and conducted under UNCITRAL Rules: – Appointment (Sole Arbitrator) dated 3 December 2015. Final Award, 28 September 2016: Infrastructure, Transportation and Energy. Claim: MYR RM45,000,000M (USD $11.250M).
Since 2003, has appeared as Counsel in numerous Court of Arbitration for Sport arbitrations (CAS Awards being enforceable under the New York Convention 1958), as referred to in ‘Sports Law’ section below.
Contractual Disputes, Equity, Trusts, Trade Practices, Banking & Finance, Securities (including Guarantees), Insolvency (including Bankruptcy), Corporations Law & Partnership, Shareholder Disputes, Insurance (incl. negligence and products liability), Media, Broadcasting & Entertainment, Infrastructure & Energy, Telecommunications and Information Technology, and Systems Failures and related Inquiries.
- Game Meats Australia Pty Limited v Farm Transparency Project Limited: – Federal Court of Australia (Melbourne). [2024] FCA 1455. Equity, Interlocutory injunction, Trespass (animal welfare activists; secure industrial plant – abattoir; film covertly obtained by activists of applicant’s undertaking), Misleading & deceptive conduct, Breach of copyright. Constitutional Law, Implied right to freedom of political communication.
- Read v Metcalf Cranes Pty Limited and Others: – County Court of Victoria (Melbourne). Coram: HHJ Clarke, 1 to 14 February 2024 (unreported). Proceeding resolved. Negligence (crane failure), Indemnity, Liability, Quantum.
- Westpac Banking Corporation v Forum Finance Pty Limited: – Federal Court of Australia (Sydney). [2022] FCA 171, [2022] FCA 910. Practice and Procedure, Interlocutory injunction restraining receiver from selling property the subject of dispute between parties, competing Barnes v Addy claim (knowing receipt and assistance), Asset tracing. Variation of freezing order, allowance for reasonable legal expenses.
- Jieyun International Investments Pty Limited v Toorak Development Group Pty Limited and Others: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Commercial Court). [2022] VSC 387 Contract, Breach of contract. Trust, Quistclose trust, Breach of trust; Knowing assistance and receipt – Barnes v Addy, Equitable compensation, Asset tracing; Misleading and Deceptive Conduct, Australian Consumer Law (Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), Schedule 2), s 18, Damages.Supreme Court of Victoria (Commercial Court). Lyons J, Unreported, 8 April 2019, 19 September 2018 and 23 August 2018, No. S CI 2018 00919. Contract, Breach of contract. Trust, Breach of trust. World-wide Freezing order, Domestic Freezing order. Search and seizure order.
- Pace and Halkias: – Full Court of the Family Court of Australia, [2021] FamCAFC 81 Practice and Procedure, Release from Harman obligation in respect of documents obtained on subpoena for use in defamation proceeding in the County Court of Victoria. Defamation, Plea of justification. Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 121.
- Tsamis v State of Victoria: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division – Defamation List). Coram: John Dixon J, Jury. Hearing: 5-9, 12-16, 19-23, 26-28 August, 16 September, 16 December 2019, 24 February 2020. [2020] VSC 67; [2019] VSC826; [2019] VSC 591; [2019] VSC 590; [2019] VSC 507; [2019] VSC 506; [2018] VSC 209; [2017] VSC 496. Defamation, Imputations capable of being defamatory, Justification, Damages, Costs. Evidence, Hearsay exception. Practice and Procedure, Witness pseudonym orders.
- Bamco Grove Pty Limited and Anor v Contek Constructions Pty Limited & Anor: – County Court of Victoria, Commercial List (Melbourne). [2019] VCC 400; [2019] VCC 327. Negligence, Insurance, Property Damage (hotel destroyed by neighbouring public works, forestry), Liability, Quantum. Costs, Indemnity Costs.
- Victorian Workcover Authority v Racing Victoria Limited: – County Court of Victoria (Melbourne). [2018] VCC 124. Insurance, Statutory recovery, Accident Compensation Act 1986 (VIC), s. 138 (Indemnity).
- Vale v Daumeke and Others: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division). [2017] VSC 467. Insurance, Negligence, Assessment of Damages. Foreign State Immunity, Foreign State Immunity Act 1985 (Cth), ss. 9, 13 and 27. Motor Vehicles (Third Party Insurance) Act Cap 177 (Fiji).
- Kassiou and Others v Heard and Another Re GEBIE Services Pty Ltd (In Liquidation): – Federal Court of Australia (Adelaide). [2017] FCA 425.Appeal/Leave to Appeal. Corporations, Corporations Act 2001, ss. 596A, 596D, 597(9). Whether company’s ‘examinable affairs’ includes personal/confidential documents of examinees.
- Kambouris v Kiatos: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal). [2016] VSCA 266. Appeal, Application for leave to appeal out of time. Damages, Assessment.
- Bridge Bar Investments Pty Ltd and Anor v Dog at the Bridge Pty Ltd and Others: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Commercial Court). [2016] VSC 224. Courts and Judges, Apprehended bias, Relevant principles.
- St Kilda Arts & Events Company (Vic) Pty Ltd and Others v Apes With Wings Pty Ltd and Another:- Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal). [2015] VSCA 199. Appeal, Application for stay of execution of judgment pending appeal.
- Telstra Corporation Ltd v Quinn Civil Pty Ltd & Ors: – County Court of Victoria (Melbourne). [2014] VCC 465. Negligence, Property damage (underground cabling), Breach of duty of care. Proportionate Liability, Wrongs Act 1958 (VIC), Part IVAA.
- Sgargetta v National Australia Bank Ltd: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal). [2014] VSCA 159. Appeal, New evidence on appeal. Mortgage and securities, Proper construction of settlement deed, Accord and conditional satisfaction, Defence of tender.
- Loftus v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd: – Supreme Court of Victoria. [2014] VSC 342. Appeal from judgment of Associate Justice, New evidence on appeal. Mortgage, summary judgment application, Triable issue. Civil Procedure Act 2010 (VIC), ss. 63, 64.
- Mathai and Others v Nelson: – High Court of Australia. [2013] HCASL 115. Federal Court of Australia. [2012] FCA 1448; (2012) 208 FCR 165. Federal Magistrates Court of Australia (Melbourne). [2011] FMCA 686; (2011) 253 FLR 139. Bankruptcy, Fraudulent disposition of property, Proof of insolvency at time of contested transfers of property, Bankruptcy Act 1974, s. 121.
- Pace and Halkias: – Full Court of the Family Court of Australia, [2021] FamCAFC 81. Practice and Procedure, Release from Harman obligation in respect of documents obtained on subpoena for use in defamation proceeding in the County Court of Victoria. Defamation, Plea of justification. Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s 121.
- Khmer Buddist temple Association Inc v Chhet (No 3): – Supreme Court of Victoria (Melbourne). [2021] VSC 560. Suppression Order, Open Courts Act 2013 (Vic), ss. 4, 10, 17, 18.
- Tsamis v State of Victoria: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division – Defamation List). Coram: John Dixon J, Jury. Hearing: 5-9, 12-16, 19-23, 26-28 August, 16 September, 16 December 2019, 24 February 2020. [2020] VSC 67; [2019] VSC 826; [2019] VSC 591; [2019] VSC 590; [2019] VSC 507; [2019] VSC 506; [2018] VSC 209; [2017] VSC 496. Defamation, Imputations capable of being defamatory, Justification, Damages, Costs. Evidence, Hearsay exception. Practice and Procedure, Witness pseudonym orders.
- Teo v Pacific Media Group Pty Ltd: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division – Defamation List). [2016] VSC 626. Practice and Procedure, Release from Harman obligation in respect of documents obtained on subpoena from VCAT. Defamation, Amendment of Defence, Plea of justification.
- Von Marburg v Aldred and Mourik: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division – Defamation List). [Dixon J, Unreported, 19 June 2015, No. S CI 2014 06065]. Defamation, Internet publication (social media). Practice and procedure, Summary dismissal, Strike-out pleading, SCR rr. 13.02, 23.02.
- Stanton v Fell: – Supreme Court of New South Wales (Court of Appeal). [2014] NSWCA 44.Supreme Court of New South Wales (Common Law Division – Defamation List). [2013] NSWSC 1001; [2014] NSWSC 1052. Defamation, Defamatory imputations and meanings, Justification, Qualified privilege, Malice, Triviality, Damages. Costs, Defamation Act 2005 (NSW), s. 40, Indemnity costs.
- Akras v Mora: – County Court of Victoria (Melbourne). Coram: Judge Murphy, Jury. Hearing: 20, 23-27, 30, 31 July, 1, 2, 13 August 2012. [2012] VCC (23 August 2012). Defamation, Justification, Qualified Privilege, Malice, Damages.
- French v Herald and Weekly Times Ltd: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division – Defamation List). [2010] VSC 127, (2010) 27 VR 140; [2010] VSC 155, (2010) 27 VR 171. Practice and Procedure, Trial by Jury or Judge alone. Defamation, Defamatory imputations and meanings, ‘Pollypeck’ Justification, Fair comment, Qualified privilege, Malice, Damages, Mitigation of damages.
- French v Triple M Melbourne Pty Ltd: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division – Defamation List). Coram: J Forrest J, Jury. Hearing: 10-14, 17-21, 24-28 November, 1 December, 2008. [2008] VSC 547; [2008] VSC 548; [2008] VSC 549; [2008] VSC 550; [2008] VSC 553. Defamation, Defamatory imputations and meanings, Justification, Fair Comment, Malice, Damages.
- French v John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd:- Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division – Defamation List). [2007] VSC 105. Defamation, Interrogatories, Application of ‘newspaper rule’ where malice pleaded in answer to fair comment defence.
- French v Triple M Melbourne Pty Ltd & Others: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Common Law Division – Defamation List). [2006] VSC 36. Practice and procedure, Setting aside default judgment, Whether arguable defence, Defamation, SCR rr. 21.01, 21.07.
Sporting Disputes conducted before the Court of Arbitration for Sport, National Sports Tribunal (AUS), Sports Resolutions (UK), Statutory & Domestic Tribunals and Courts, including Doping, Selection, Eligibility, Integrity, On & Off Field Conduct, Results & Outcomes, Contractual Disputes, Sponsorship, Competition Organisation, Governance & Membership and Public/Private International Law.
Tribunal Member (Select Cases)
- Cerejo v World Rugby: – World Rugby Independent Judicial Committee, Chair. Decision, 20 May 2025. Sports Law. Doping, TUE, Unintentional ADRV, Sanction.
- Wellman v World Rugby: – World Rugby Independent Judicial Committee, Chair. Decision, 12 December 2023. Sports Law. Doping, Unintentional ADRV, Sanction.
- International Biathlon Union v Ustyugov: – International Biathlon Union Anti-Doping Hearing Panel. Decision, 13 February 2020. Sports Law. Doping, Non-analytical positive ADRV, Sanction.
- International Biathlon Union v Sleptsova: – International Biathlon Union Anti-Doping Hearing Panel. Decision, 11 February 2020. Sports Law. Doping, Non-analytical positive ADRV, Sanction.
- Palamo v World Rugby: – World Rugby Independent Judicial Committee. Decision, 16 August 2017. Sports Law. Doping, Unintentional ADRV, Sanction.
- Rayson v Athletics Australia: – Athletics Australia Selection Appeals Tribunal, Chair. Decision, 8 July 2013. Sports Law. Selection, Proper application of Nomination Criteria.
- Snowsill v Triathlon Australia: – Triathlon Australia Appeals Tribunal. Decision, 11 June 2012. Sports Law. Selection, Proper application of Nomination Criteria.
As Counsel
- Kettlewell v Australian Endurance Riders Association Inc and Another: – National Sports Tribunal of Australia. Proceeding NST-E24-105202. Consent Award dated 5 September 2024. Sports Law. Alleged equine ADRV, Jurisdiction, No fault/No significant fault, Applicable Sanction.
- Air Sport Australia Confederation v Federation Aeronautique Internationale: – Court of Arbitration for Sport, Lausanne. CAS 2021/A/8550 (Lausanne). Award & Order dated 15 February 2022. CAS Jurisdiction, Time limit for appeal.
- Liddick v Gymnastics Australia and Sport Integrity Australia: – National Sports Tribunal of Australia. Proceeding NST-E21-148352, Interim Award dated 13 December 2021, Final Award dated 28 January 2022. Sports Law. Conduct, GA Code of Conduct and Member Protection Policy; Safeguarding; Limitation of Actions; Applicable sanction.
- Marton v Australian Taekwondo: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2021/A/8089 (Sydney). Final Award, 11 November 2021. Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2021/A/7945 (Sydney). Final Award, 9 June 2021. Australian Taekwondo Appeals Tribunal, Decision dated 26 April 2021. Sports Law, Olympic nomination and selection, Proper construction of Nomination Criteria, Correct application of Nomination Criteria.
- Donald v Rowing Australia: – Rowing Australia Appeals Tribunal, Decision dated 24 March 2021. Sports Law, Olympic nomination and selection, Proper construction of Nomination Criteria, Correct application of Nomination Criteria.
- Neil and Equestrian Australia v Hanna: – National Sports Tribunal of Australia. Proceeding NST-E20-258261, Award dated 5 November 2020. Sports Law. Conduct, EA Social Media Policy; NST Jurisdiction.
- Peris v Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority and Athletics Australia: – Federal Court of Australia / Court of Arbitration for Sport. Retained 2018-2019. Sports Law. Doping, Alleged ADRV.
- Talbot v Federation Internationale De L’Automobile: – Court of Arbitration for Sport, Lausanne. CAS 2016/A/4635 (Lausanne). Sports Law. Doping, Alleged ADRV.
- Iles v Shooting Australia: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS A1/2016 (Sydney). Partial Award, 30 June 2016; Final Award, 9 September 2016.Sports Law, Olympic nomination and selection, Proper construction of Nomination Criteria, Correct application of Nomination Criteria.
- Lloyd & Elks v Australian Sailing: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS A3/2016 (Sydney). Final Award, 12 July 2016. Sports Law, Olympic nomination and selection, Proper construction of Nomination Criteria, Correct application of Nomination Criteria.
- Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority and Athletics Australia v Mottrom: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Ordinary Division). CAS A4/2014 (Sydney). Partial Award (Jurisdiction), 27 March 2015. Final Award, 21 March 2016. International Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Termination of arbitration, CAS Code of Sports-related Arbitration, Rule 64.2. Sports Law, Doping, Reliability of laboratory analysis of positive sample test result.
- Equestrian Australia v Kenzig: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2014/A/3738 (Sydney). Partial Award, 9 January 2015. Final Award, 5 March 2015. Equestrian Australia Tribunal (Sydney). Decision, 20 August 2014. Sports Law. Doping, ‘B’ sample, Results management, Proof of alleged ADRV.
- Tennis Australia and Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority v Mousley: – Tennis Australia Anti-Doping Tribunal (Melbourne). Decision, 18 August 2014. Sports Law. Doping, World Anti-Doping Code 2009, Article 10.4, Sanction.
- Jusup & Hikmet v Football Federation of Victoria (FFV) Inc: – Magistrates Court of Victoria (Melbourne). [Lauritsen CM, unreported, 7 October 2013, No D12423452]. Incorporated Associations, Oppression, Interlocutory injunction, Transfer of action to Supreme Court of Victoria. Associations Incorporation Reform Act 2012 (Vic), ss. 68(1), 68(4), 68(6), 69, 220.
- Hill v Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority and Cycling Australia: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2013/A/3242 (Sydney). Award, 24 September 2013. International Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Separability of arbitration agreement. Cycling Australia Anti-Doping Policy Clauses 15.7, 15.8, 16, 19. CAS Code of Sports-related Arbitration, Rules 28, 55 and Statute of Bodies Working for the Settlement of Sports-related Disputes, Article S1. Federal Code on Private International Law 1987 (Switzerland) Articles 186, 190(2).
- Football Federation of Victoria Inc v North Sunshine Eagles Football Club and Sporting Whittlesea Football Club: – Football Federation of Victoria Tribunal (Melbourne). Decision, 9 August 2013. Sports Law. Misconduct, Post-match melee, FFV Grievance & Disciplinary By-Law, Sanction.
- Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority v McGough: – Australian Football League Anti-Doping Tribunal (Melbourne). Decision, 15 March 2013. Sports Law. Doping, Intention to commit ADRV, AFL Anti-Doping Code Clause 14(3), Onus of Proof, Sanction.
- Walker v Australian Biathlon Association Incorporated: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Ordinary Division). CAS 2011/A/2590 (Sydney). Award, 15 December 2011. Sports Law. Selection, Proper application of ABA/IOC WYOG nomination/selection criteria, exclusion of race results of ‘ineligible’ athlete, conduct and subsequent consideration of shortened selection race.
- Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority v Casserly: – Western Australian Football League Appeals Tribunal (Perth). Decision, 3 June 2011. Sports Law. Doping, Intention to commit ADRV, AFL Anti-Doping Code Clause 14(3), Onus of Proof, Sanction.
- Buckley v Boxing Australia Incorporated (BAI) & Association of International Boxing Associations (AIBA): – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Ordinary Division) CAS 2010/O/2118 (Melbourne). Sports Law. Athlete surgically fitted with cardiac pacemaker, Risk or advantage to athlete, Power of AIBA/BAI to ban athlete. Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth), ss. 4-6, 28. Equal Opportunity Act 1995 (Vic), ss. 6(b), 8-10, 64-66.
- Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority v Nisbet: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Ordinary Division). CAS A2/2009 (Sydney). Award, 2 February 2010. Sports Law. Doping, No significant fault or negligence. Sanction.
- Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority v Atkins: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Ordinary Division). CAS A1/2009 (Melbourne). Award, 4 November 2009. Sports Law. Doping, Whether athlete bound by NF Anti-doping Policy. ADRV consequences for athlete and other team members.
- World Anti-Doping Agency & International Rugby Board v Australian Rugby Union & Troy: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2008/A/1652 (Sydney). Appeal Award, 18 March 2009; 2 June 2009; (2009) 4(1) ANZSLJR 1.Sports Law. Doping, Non-analytical positive ADRV. Appeals, Time limit for lodgement of appeal under the ARU Anti-Doping By-Law and the CAS Rules.
- Swimming Australia Ltd v D’Arcy: – Swimming Australia Tribunal (Sydney). Decision, 21 April 2009. Sports Law. Athlete conduct. Sanction.
- Doyle v Australian Saloon Car Federation: – Australian Motor Sport Appeals Court (Melbourne). Appeal Ruling, 15 April 2009. Sports Law. Fuel Tampering, Fuel sampling procedure, relevance and reliability of ‘B’ sample in absence of ‘A’ sample test.
- D’Arcy v Australian Olympic Committee Inc: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2008/A/1574 (Sydney). Appeal Award, 7 July 2008; (2008) 3(1) ANZSLJR 1. Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2008/A/1539 (Sydney). Appeal Award, 2 June 2008. (Also appeared on behalf of the Appellant before the Executive of the Australian Olympic Committee Inc, upon an application for his continued inclusion in the 2008 Australian Olympic Team, on 11 June 2008).Sports Law. Misconduct, Bringing self into disrepute, Proper exercise of discretion to expel team member. Sanction, Severity, Proportionality. Scope of appellate jurisdiction of the CAS.
- Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority v Van Tienan: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Ordinary Division). CAS 2007/A3 (Melbourne). Award, 16 June 2008. Sports Law. Doping, Non-analytical positive ADRV, World Anti-Doping Code 2007 Articles 2.2 & 3.2, Reliable means of proof of ADRV. Sanction.
- Zubkov v Federation Internationale de Natation (FINA): – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2007/A/1291 (Lausanne, Switzerland). Appeal Award, 21 December 2007. Sports Law. Misconduct, Bringing sport into disrepute, FINA Code of Conduct. Sanction, Severity, Proportionality.
- Marinov v Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2007/A/1311 (Melbourne). Final Appeal Award (Save as to costs), 26 September 2007; (2007) 2(1) ANZSLJR 2. Final Award on Costs, 20 December 2007. Award (First Instance), 9 June 2007. Sports Law. Doping, Non-analytical positive ADRV, Whether official ‘knowingly’ in possession of prohibited substance.
- French v Australian Sports Commission and Cycling Australia: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2004/A/651 (Sydney & Melbourne). Award (Appeal), 11 July 2005; Award (First Instance), 8 June 2004. Sports Law. Doping, CAS Appeals, Admissibility of new evidence on appeal. Private International Law. Costs. (Also appeared for the Appellant before the Anderson Inquiry, convened by the Federal Minister for Sport, in 2004).
- Beaton and Scholes v Equestrian Federation of Australia Ltd: – Court of Arbitration for Sport (Appeals Division). CAS 2003/A/477 (Melbourne). Appeal Award, 20 October 2003. Sports Law. Doping, Athlete’s rights, Opportunity for Athlete to be present at opening of ‘B’ sample.
- Beaton and Another v Equestrian Federation of Australia Ltd: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Commercial & Equity Division). [2003] VSC 252. Associations & Clubs, Tribunals, Right to legal representation before Tribunal.
- Roxburgh Park Resident’s Association Inc. (Roxburgh Park Football Club) v Essendon District Football League: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Commercial & Equity Division). Proceedings No. 5195 of 2003. Sports Law. Competition organisation. Right of club to participate in competition.
- Drummoyne District Rugby Club Inc v New South Wales Rugby Union Ltd: – Supreme Court of New South Wales (Equity Division). (1994) Aust. Contract R 90-359. Contract, Privity, Umbrella organisation; Estoppel.
- Jones v The Chief Stipendiary Steward of the Australian Jockey Club (The ‘Kings Encore’ Appeal): – Australian Jockey Club (General Committee). 18 September 1992. Sports Law. Racing. Doping. Meaning of ‘prohibited substance’ (as provided by ARs 1, 8, 117B, 178 and 178A).
- Australian Epic Health Services Pty Ltd v National Disability Insurance Agency: – Federal Court of Australia (Melbourne). Coram: Horan J, 9 December 2024 (unreported). Administrative Law, Judicial Review, Irrelevant considerations.
- Marsh v Medical Board of Australia: – VCAT (Melbourne). [2023] VCAT 1320. Administrative Law, Health Practitioner Regulation law (Victoria) Act 2009 (Vic), Restriction on doctor’s registration, Public interest in continuity of restriction.
- Tam v Worksafe Victoria: – Supreme Court of New South Wales. [2023] NSWSC 173. Administrative Law, Judicial review, Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013 (Vic), ss. 333, 337(2), Decision not to consent to damages proceedings commenced out of time.
- Crozier v Department of Health: – Victorian Consumer and Administrative Tribunal (President, Quigley J). [2022] VCAT 1301. Administrative Law, Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Vic), ss.25(a), 32(1), 33(1) and 50(4), Relevance of documents, Legal professional privilege and personal affairs exemptions, Public interest override.
- Jerak v Lazarus: – Supreme Court of Victoria. [2020] VSC 729. Administrative Law, Jurisdictional Error; Workplace Injury Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 2013 (Vic), ss. 537(8), 540; Opinion of Medical Panel set aside.
- Nolan v Executive Director, Land Management Policy, Department of Environment and Primary Industries: – Supreme Court of Victoria (Court of Appeal). [2015] VSCA 301. Administrative Law, Judicial review, Public Administration Act 2004, s. 63, Crown Land (Reserves) Act 1978, s. 14B, Victorian Public Entities Directors’ Code of Conduct 2006, Duties of committee members, Availability of declaratory relief; Appeals, new argument on appeal.
- Blue Wedges Inc v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts: – Federal Court of Australia (Melbourne). [2008] FCA 399; (2008) 167 FCR 463. Administrative Law, Judicial review, Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth), ss. 131, 136.
- Goryl v Greyhound Australia Pty Ltd and Another: – High Court of Australia. (1994) 179 CLR 463; (1994) 120 ALR 605; (1994) 68 ALJR 432; (1994) 19 MVR 405; (1994) Aust Torts Reports 81-628.The Constitution, ss. 117, 118, Discrimination by the Legislature of Queensland against residents of other Australian States. Motor Vehicles Insurance Act 1936 (QLD), ss. 16, 19, 20.






