Mental Capacity Resource Centre

Chambers has developed an unrivalled set of resources for those seeking to apply and understand the Mental Capacity Act 2005, as well as to understand the place of mental capacity within the law more generally.  This section of the website gathers together a range of resources (1) our Mental Capacity Reports, free, monthly, reports covering all areas of law and practice relating to the MCA; (2) our guidance notes, including on assessing and determining capacity and best interests; and (3) our caselaw database, which summarises and comments upon the cases decided by the Court of Protection (and other courts considering the MCA).

Scroll down the page for each of these, or use the filter to navigate rapidly to what most interests you (and also to see articles written by members of the Court of Protection team).

Please click here to sign up to our monthly newsletter.

Search

Filter By

  • In the Property and Affairs Report:  new OPG investigation requirements and the consequences thereof. For all of our reports, newsletters and cases please visit our Mental Capacity Law Resource Centre. Click below to download the Property and Affairs Report.

  • Welcome to the May 2026 Mental Capacity Report. Highlights this month include: In the Health, Welfare and Deprivation of Liberty Report: Townsend updated, sex before the Court of Protection again, and a profoundly disturbing report on dementia in acute hospitals; In the Property and Affairs Report: new OPG investigation requirements and the consequences thereof; In the Practice and Procedure Report: importance guidance on instructing experts, when habitual residence can be revisited, and a very useful new book on coercive control; In the Mental Health Matters Report: the legal gaps for those in mental health crisis in ED and misunderstandings of the MCA in the [...]

  • In the Scotland Report: an update on the new AWI accreditation programme being run by the Law Society of Scotland. For all of our reports, newsletters and cases please visit our Mental Capacity Law Resource Centre.Click below to download the Mental Capacity Report: Scotland.

  • In the Wider Context Report: the MCA and suicide, and new guidance on consenting to clinical trials.For all of our reports, newsletters and cases please visit our Mental Capacity Law Resource Centre.Click below to download the Wider Context Report.

  • In the Children’s Capacity Report: deprivation of liberty of children in statute and in unregulated placements and what procedural fairness (does) not require in assessment.For all of our reports, newsletters and cases please visit our Mental Capacity Law Resource Centre.Click below to download the Children's Capacity Report.

  • In the Mental Health Matters Report: the legal gaps for those in mental health crisis in ED and misunderstandings of the MCA in the mental health context. For all of our reports, newsletters and cases please visit our Mental Capacity Law Resource Centre. Click below to download the Mental Health Matters Report.

  • In the Practice and Procedure Report: importance guidance on instructing experts, when habitual residence can be revisited, and a very useful new book on coercive control. For all of our reports, newsletters and cases please visit our Mental Capacity Law Resource Centre.Click below to download the Practice and Procedure Report.

  • In the Health, Welfare and Deprivation of Liberty Report: Townsend updated, sex before the Court of Protection again, and a profoundly disturbing report on dementia in acute hospitals. For all of our reports, newsletters and cases please visit our Mental Capacity Law Resource Centre. Click below to download the Health, Welfare and Deprivation of Liberty Report.

  • Welcome to the April 2026 Mental Capacity Report. It takes a different form to normal as our editors’ commitments means that we cannot do more than provide an overview of some key matters, with more to follow (where necessary) in May. We do, however, have a bumper Scotland Report to make up for the lack of such a Report last time – and we would, commend the Scotland report to readers from other jurisdictions as it contains both comparative matters of interest, and research of wider reach than just Scotland. A reminder that we have updated our unofficial update to [...]

  • This guidance note sits alongside our guidance note on carrying out and recording capacity assessments, and is designed to assist social workers and those working in frontline clinical settings when they asked to consider a person’s capacity to make a decision or decisions. As set out in our guidance note, the courts have now applied the MCA 2005 in respect of very many types of decision. In the course of doing so, they have given indications as to what they consider to be relevant (and sometimes irrelevant) information for purposes of those decisions – i.e. what the person must be [...]

Mental Capacity Cases

  • Summary CGT (acting through his father, SGT) as litigation friend, brought a judicial review of a decision taken by West Sussex County Council in June 2024 to: Refuse to provide care and support to CGT on the basis that he did not financially qualify; and Refuse to reimburse CGT for discretionary funding he had been provided since June 2020. CGT was born in 1994. He suffered a brain injury as an infant which led to his having a severe cognitive impairment, visual impairment, epilepsy and other life-long difficulties. He has lived in supported accommodation since 2013, and has been found [...]

  • Summary Cwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board v RW & Anor [2026] EWCOP 10 (T3) provides a snapshot of the realities of navigating health and welfare decision-making of a kind that rarely makes it to court.[1]  In short compass, it concerns a failure by a hospital to consult with an attorney regarding decision-making about life-sustaining treatment.  In the context of a considerable focus on understanding about the MCA in Parliament at the moment, it is important to emphasise that failures to apply the Act are not uncommon, including (here) failures to comply with a clear statutory duty to consult.  What is uncommon [...]

  • Summary Re DA (Whether to replace a Single Joint Expert) [2026] EWCOP 7 (T2) is a decision which, as its name helpfully makes clear, is about a procedural point that sometimes arises, namely where one party to a joint instruction of an expert (here a psychiatrist) is sufficiently discontented with their report that they want another run at matters.  On the facts of the case before him, HHJ Burrows rejected the criticisms of the expert levelled at him by a number of the parties, both as to whether he had acted improperly in having a discussion with the solicitor for [...]

  • Summary In Re AB (Enable & Thrive Ltd) [2026] EWCOP 11 (T3), Senior Judge Hilder, not without a certain degree of reluctance, confirmed that a trust corporation which has (corporately) no independent regulatory oversight can, in some situations, be appointed as a property and affairs deputy.  That category of trust corporation had been envisaged in an earlier judgment of Senior Judge Hilder, Various Incapacitated Persons and the Appointment of Trust Corporations as Deputies [2018] EWCOP 3, identified Re AB as “the First Judgment.” Senior Judge Hilder revisited the conclusions of the First Judgment as regards the undertakings that must provided before [...]

  • Summary This case concerned an application by Alison Parr, the mother of an 18 year old to be appointed as welfare deputy for her daughter, Ruby.  Ruby lived with her mother and two siblings, with her mother being her lead carer and the person co-ordinating Ruby’s care package. Ruby had a severe learning disability and multiple serious health problems including intractable epilepsy, and was on long term ventilation and was fed by PEG. Her mother’s application had been rejected on the papers (as is common) but on reconsideration, Poole J granted the deputyship order and permitted the family to be [...]

  • Summary[1] In the Capacity and Self-Determination Law 2016, Jersey has a framework which looks a great deal like the Mental Capacity Act 2005; the Jersey courts look to the caselaw in England & Wales to help them navigate some of the dilemmas that they are encountering in considering capacity and best interests. The decision in Re E [2026]JRC002 provides an example – we suggest – where the English courts might well wish to look south. The case was brought by the Delegate (the equivalent of a Deputy) for a young man, E, seeking the Court’s blessing of her decision to [...]

  • Summary Whether you can have capacity to conduct proceedings about a decision you lack capacity to make is a question that infrequently, but consistently, troubles the Court of Protection. Mostyn J once memorably describing the potential for such a scenario to be as rare as a white leopard.  SJ v Cardiff & Vale University Health Board & Anor [2025] EWCOP 54 (T2), a case decided before Christmas, but which has only recently come onto Bailii,[1] contains a very thorough analysis of whether a white leopard had been spotted.  The court in that case was faced with the situation where there [...]

  • EF was a 44-year-old man with Down’s Syndrome. He had kidney failure and required thrice weekly dialysis and medication to manage his phosphate levels. He had missed many sessions and had not stayed for the full required time at many more sessions, with the result that his dialysis was chronically inadequate, putting him at risk of sudden death or other complications, including difficulty breathing, heart and peripheral vascular problems, acute confusion, damage to bones and blood vessels, and painful, and/or uncomfortable skin conditions. The three represented parties (NHS Trust, EF by the Official Solicitor, and the local authority with safeguarding [...]

  • Summary In this case, McKendrick J granted an application by the applicant NHS Trust for EF to be removed from the lifelong care of his father, NN, and placed in a nearby supported living placement for the purposes of ensuring he received a sufficient level of dialysis and regular medication. EF was a 44-year-old man with Down’s Syndrome. He had kidney failure and required thrice weekly dialysis and medication to manage his phosphate levels. He had missed many sessions and had not stayed for the full required time at many more sessions, with the result that his dialysis was chronically [...]

  • Summary This case concerned SL, a 30-year-old woman with complex needs who lived with her parents. By the time of the hearing, there was broad agreement between the parties that SL should remain living at home with her parents with the current comprehensive package of support. It was also agreed that there should be a pause of at least six months in assessing SL for, and introducing her to, alternative placements, given the level of distress that the process of moving placements had caused her to date. Theis J heard oral evidence from GF, the allocated social worker, DL and [...]

Sign up to Our Thinking

Sign up now to receive our latest newsletters, legal insights and information on upcoming events.