Public Law Analysis - Tom Tabori

Tom Tabori, interviewed by Varsha Patel of LexisNexis, discusses the principles that should be considered when assessing proportionality of interference with qualified rights on the basis of pressing social need.

Addressing (i) the restrictions that can legitimately be placed by a public authority on ECHR qualified rights by virtue of pressing social need, (ii) the matters that the courts have taken into consideration when determining whether such interference is proportionate to the outcome sought particularly in public interest cases, and (iii) what recent caselaw has clarified and left unclear, this latest LexisNexis practice note gives an update on and overview of a perennially engaged set of principles

To read the full article, please click here.