Katherine Apps KC
Year of call: 2006
Silk: 2023
The Court of Appeal has handed down judgment in R(Gulshan) v Lord Chancellor [2023] EWCA Civ 306 on 22 March 2023 refusing the Claimant’s application for permission to appeal against the Administrative Court’s refusal of permission for judicial review.
Mr Gulshan had sought to argue that HMCTS policy limiting the default length of Kirpans (one of the Sikh articles of faith: a small curved knife in a sheath) permitted in Court buildings. The Policy provided that Kirpans of overall length less than six inches, with a blade no more than 4 inches, carried by a member of the Sikh Community would usually be permitted, but the Policy also provided for discretion in individual cases. The Claimant’s kirpan was 8 inches long and he was denied permission to enter with it by Ealing Magistrates Court in April 2021. The Claimant sought judicial review against the Policy and in respect of what he alleged occurred on that day. The claim alleged that the Policy itself was ultra vires, breach of Article 8, 9 and 14 ECHR and breaches of the Equality Act 2010.
The Court of Appeal’s judgment dismisses the Claimant’s application for permission to appeal. The Court:
A link to the Court of Appeal’s judgment is here.
Katherine Apps KC represented the Lord Chancellor, instructed by the Government Legal Department.