Mental Capacity Case
A Health and Social Care Trust v X et al
Judge
High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland (OâHara J)
Citation
Summary
Mr X had died by the time of this judgment, but the decision is likely to affect hundreds of individuals in Northern Ireland in similar circumstances. The case concerned a man lacking capacity around his care arrangements who was confined to a care home. The exit doors were secured at all times. He had freedom of movement within the home but not beyond it. Activities were provided for him to join in such as planned trips, visits to an "open unit" within the same home and access to the secure garden area. During almost all of these activities he was escorted.The Trust applied for a guardianship order and the issue was whether this covered Mr X's deprivation of liberty. For these purposes, the guardian's powers under Article 18 of the Mental Health NI Order 1986 are not dissimilar to those in England and Wales. Only the Attorney General submitted that it was unnecessary to get authorisation to deprive liberty under the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court on the basis that guardianship could be interpreted to cover it. The other parties agreed such an authorisation was necessary.
O'Hara J held:
- Put simply, there is no authority for reading the guardianship provisions in the manner proposed by the Attorney General. It is more than regrettable that there is still a significant gap in our legislation but that is not a reason to interpret it in the manner suggested.
- The obvious solution is to give responsibility to the Mental Health Review Tribunal which is unquestionably the body with all of the necessary skills and experience to fill this role. Whether it is the High Court or the Tribunal, additional resources will be required because the consequence of Cheshire West is to require legal sanction for what were previously regarded simply as benign arrangements.