+44 (0)20 7832 1111
Welcome to 39 Essex Chambers
39 Essex Chambers is a leading set based in London, Manchester, Kuala Lumpur and Singapore. Our barristers offer a depth of expertise in a range of specialist sectors and practice areas.
Practice Areas
- Administrative & Public
- Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Banking & Finance
- Civil Liability
- Clinical Negligence
- Commercial
- Construction
- Costs & Litigation Funding
- Court of Protection
- EU Law
- Inquiries & Investigations
- Intellectual Property
- International Arbitration
- International Litigation
- Medical Treatment
- Personal Injury
- Planning, Environment & Property
- Regulatory & Disciplinary
- Tax
39 Essex Chambers regularly produces case reports, articles, newsletters and seminar across a range of areas.
Please subscribe to our mailing list if you would like to receive regular updates.
Regulatory & Disciplinary
Without government guidance or PPE, doctors will have to make more unpopular choices about which lives to save
Vikram Sachdeva QC and David Lock QC write about human rights, limited resources and legal conundrums in The Independent. Without government guidance or PPE, doctors will have to make more… Read more »
SEMINAR: Sex, Lies and Videotape (and the new Rules) – how lawyers get into, and out of, hot water, and when it has to be reported to the regulator
In this seminar, chaired by Mrs Justice Foster, Gregory Treverton-Jones QC and Alexis Hearnden will discuss: Current priorities in the SRA investigations The new reporting rules in the 2019 Codes of Conduct Case studies… Read more »
High Court confirms that certain actions taken in divorce proceedings can lawfully be performed by non-lawyers
JK v MK and E-Negotiation Ltd (trading as amicable) and The Queen’s Proctor [2020] EWFC 2 In an important judgment handed down on Monday 20 January 2020 relevant to disciplinary… Read more »
Daniel Benedyk successfully represents the Solicitors Regulation Authority in a challenge to higher rights of audience
Daniel Benedyk successfully represented the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in the High Court, in a judicial review brought by a solicitor against a decision that he was not authorised to… Read more »
The Court of Appeal gives guidance on the circumstances in which a Medical Practitioners Tribunal (MPT) should adjourn, in the absence of a practitioner
On 16 July 2019 the Court of Appeal (Richards LJ, Simler LJ, Theis J) handed down judgment in the case of Sanusi v General Medical Council [2019] EWCA Civ 1172…. Read more »
Daniel Benedyk successfully represents the Bar Standards Board in a challenge against pupillage requirements
Daniel Benedyk successfully represented the Bar Standards Board (BSB) in the High Court, in a claim brought by an aspiring barrister for exemption from the pupillage requirements. The case concerned… Read more »
Call +44 (0)20 7832 1111 for more information