Hislop v Perde: Kaur v Committee (for the time being) of Ramgarhia Board Leicester [2018] EWCA Civ 1726



Judge: Longmore LJ, King LJ and Coulson LJ

Citation: [2018] EWCA Civ 1726

Summary:

In fixed costs cases, rule 36.13 does not apply where a Part 36 offer is accepted late.

Longer text:

It is not possible for a Claimant whose offer has been accepted late, but before trial, to rely on the decision in Broadhurst v Tan[1] to obtain indemnity costs.  CPR Rule 36.20 makes it plain that it is the only rule which applies to the costs consequences of accepting a Part 36 offer in fixed costs cases.  The interaction between the fixed costs regime and Part 36 differs where the Claimant is successful after trial and where a Part 36 offer is accepted before trial.  On the correct interpretation of the Rules, in a fixed costs case, Rule 36.20 applies where an offer is accepted late and Rule 36.13 does not apply at all.

[1]  [2016] EWCA Civ 94

Date

Keywords


Sign up to our Costs Cases Newsletter


    Before submitting this form please read and agree to our Privacy Notice. Form submissions will only be held for 24 hours, after which they will be automatically deleted.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Call +44 (0)20 7832 1111 for more information

Barrister portfolio

Close

Click the + icon next to any barrister to add their profile to this portfolio.

Barrister Call CV Email