De Louville De Toucy v Bonhams 1793 Ltd

Judge: Vos J.

Citation: [2011] All ER (D) 32 (Nov)

Summary: In this Chancery Division decision, a full transcript of which is not yet available, Vos J was asked to consider whether it was appropriate to make a bankruptcy order pursuant to the Insolvency Rules against a person who lacked capacity.

The Court held:

1. There was no inconsistency between the Insolvency Rules (defining an ‘incapacitated person’) and the CPR (defining a ‘protected party’). ‘Incapacity’ for the purposes of the Insolvency Rules covered not merely those falling within the definition of protected party within the CPR, but also included those suffering from a physical disability or affliction.
2. The Registrar should not have declared the claimant bankrupt: he ought to have:
a. been aware that the claimant was incapable;
b. adjourned the case for a representative or litigation friend to be appointed; and
c. heard representations from such a person.
3. On the evidence, the financial situation was complex and, without proper investigation, it was impossible to be sure that it was appropriate to make a bankruptcy order.

The order was set aside and the matter referred to the Registrar to be heard again.

Comment: As with the decision of District Judge Ashton noted in March 2011 edition, this is a clear reminder of the burden both upon parties and upon the Court in acting upon an indication that a party to bankruptcy proceedings may be incapable of engaging in the proceedings.

CategoryPractice and procedure - Other Date


Sign up to our Mental Capacity Law Newsletter

    Before submitting this form please read and agree to our Privacy Notice. Form submissions will only be held for 24 hours, after which they will be automatically deleted.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Call +44 (0)20 7832 1111 for more information

Barrister portfolio


Click the + icon next to any barrister to add their profile to this portfolio.

Barrister Call CV Email