+44 (0)20 7832 1111
Welcome to 39 Essex Chambers
39 Essex Chambers is a leading set based in London, Manchester, Kuala Lumpur and Singapore. Our barristers offer a depth of expertise in a range of specialist sectors and practice areas.
39 Essex Chambers regularly produces case reports, articles, newsletters and seminar across a range of areas.
Please subscribe to our mailing list if you would like to receive regular updates.
In Harrow Clinical Commissioning Group v IPJ & Ors [2018] EWCOP 44, SJ Hilder considered a classic situation of “only one option” in relation to a young man of 24,… Read more »
Summary This case concerned the care and residence of a 56 year old woman with significant physical health problems as well as schizophrenia and a learning disability. She had lived… Read more »
Summary and Comment In a trilogy of judgments, HHJ Moir made findings of fact, determined mental incapacity, and made best interests decisions on behalf of a lady in her 60s… Read more »
Summary P was 26 years old with severe learning disability and autistic spectrum disorder. His placement broke down and he was urgently moved into a care home on 5 September… Read more »
Summary This case concerned LC’s (Mrs C’s) best interests in relation to residence, contact with her husband and a deprivation of her liberty. Mrs C was a 74 year old… Read more »
Summary: The unedifying saga of the Redbridge v G case that we have been reporting on in recent newsletters has come to an end for now at least, in the… Read more »
Summary: As District Judge Eldergill says in his introduction, “these proceedings have a long history.” They concern an elderly man (now 84 years old), RGS who suffers from vascular dementia… Read more »
Summary: Ms Manuela Sykes was by nature a fighter; a campaigner; a person of passion. Having been involved in many of the moral, political and ideological battles of the last… Read more »
Summary: These proceedings concerned the appropriate place of residence of Ms K, a 60 year old woman with Down’s syndrome and severe learning disabilities. She had resided in the family… Read more »
Summary: The Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether ECHR Art 8 respect for family life requires the court in determining issues under the inherent jurisdiction or the Mental… Read more »
Call +44 (0)20 7832 1111 for more information
Click the + icon next to any barrister to add their profile to this portfolio.
Barrister | Call | CV |
---|
Click here to email this list of barristers to a colleague
Remove All