“an incisive decision-maker who inspires confidence within clients”
Chambers & Partners
John Steel QC’s main areas of practice are planning, environmental, aviation, and compulsory purchase law. He specialises in public inquiries and judicial review. He is cited as a recommended leader by Chambers & Partners, The Legal 500 and UK Legal Experts.
His planning and environmental law practice has encompassed the full range of development and major infrastructure projects, including housing, employment and industrial land development, energy, minerals and waste, retail, highways and transportation, noise and emissions, ecology, engineering, architecture and historic buildings, economics, sports stadiums, racecourses and racetracks. He has represented central government departments, local authorities, regulators, major companies, landowners and developers, as well as private individuals. He is an acknowledged expert with specialist knowledge in airport and aviation development, as well as aviation and aerospace regulatory law.
He is joint head of the Planning, Environment and Property law group in Chambers, head of the Aviation and Aerospace law group, is a qualified international arbitrator and CEDR accredited mediator, and practices through Chambers’ offices in Singapore and Kuala Lumpur. He is also a Recorder, Bencher of Gray’s Inn, instrument rated pilot, honorary Fellow of Law of Durham University Law School, board member of Durham Global Security Institute and honorary legal adviser to the Air League.
Click here to view John’s full Aviation & Aerospace CV.
John Steel QC is a qualified arbitrator and Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitration. He specialises in national and international arbitration in particular concerning aviation, aerospace, planning and airport development. He is an experienced pilot (fixed wing and helicopters), chairman of the Air League and a Fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society. A recent case in which he was appointed arbitrator was in the matter of an arbitration between MHS Aviation Berhad and Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd, concerning a claim in relation to termination of a RM3.1bil offshore helicopter services contract in Malaysia. He has wide experience of aviation and aerospace matters, including in relation to major international airport development as well as regional airports. His cases in the UK High Court and Court of Appeal included representing the UK Civil Aviation Authority with respect to AAIB litigation and the responsibilities of the regulator, as well as actions against the Department for Transport and CAA with respect to airspace changes and airport safety. He has recently been appointed to be a member of the Kirkhope Parliamentary inquiry panel into Airspace and Airspace Changes in the UK.
John is recognised as a leading practitioner in aviation, aerospace, planning, transport and environmental law.
His clients include airports, airlines, aerospace companies, major utilities and industrial companies in the UK and elsewhere, as well as banks, insurers, Government departments and agencies, local authorities, NGOs and individuals.
He has been involved in some of the leading cases in matters such as major airport development, aviation law, planning and environmental law, noise and key infrastructure projects including new roads, motorways, railways, tramways, ports, guided busways, power stations and waste to energy plants.
In aviation and aerospace, high-profile cases have included the development of London Heathrow, London Gatwick and London Stansted airports, as well as the development and use of regional and other airports at London Luton, Birmingham, Bournemouth, Coventry, Farnborough, London Oxford, Biggin Hill, Southend, Newcastle, East Midlands, Liverpool John Lennon, Sheffield, RAF Northolt, Dunsfold, Fairoaks, Plymouth, and a number of smaller General Aviation aerodromes and proposed heliports. He is the joint author of one of the key papers submitted to the Davies Commission on UK Airport Capacity in 2014 and has been appointed legal adviser to the All Party Parliamentary Group on General Aviation in the UK Parliament. He is also the Chairman of The Air League and the voice of the aviation and aerospace sectors in the UK.
John is a well-known senior practitioner probably uniquely with detailed knowledge of the design, workings and regulation of airports and aerospace both in the civil / airline as well as military / defence sectors, involving the UK CAA, Ministry of Defence, Department for Transport, NATS, Eurocontrol, EASA, ICAO, airport operators and airlines, on the use and regulation of airports and aircraft, including the three dimensional aspects of air traffic control, radar, aircraft safety and accidents, airport design and surface access.
He has represented and advised, or been involved with, major international and other airlines, both in the courts, at public inquiries and in government commissions and consultations. He has been a contributor on behalf of the airline industry to aviation policy documents, including the UK Aviation and Airport Policy published by the UK Government.
Clients have included various Airport Operators and Authorities; Airlines and Aircraft Operators; Cargo Operators; and Aviation and Aerospace Organisations and Companies, including BAA, British Airways, BMI, BAE Systems, Farnborough International, Cathay Pacific, Dragonair, Low Cost Airlines including Ryanair and EasyJet, Flybe, TAG Aviation, Gama Aviation, Hangar 8, BBGA, and AOPA. Private individuals have included the Reuben Brothers, Dial Partners, banks and other airport owners, investors and operators.
John has been elected a Fellow of the Royal Aeronautical Society, a member of the Aviation Club of the UK, with affiliation to the Aerospace Forum Asia, The Aero Club of Washington and The International Aviation Club, also in Washington. John was, for a number of years, the honorary legal adviser to The Air League and is now Chairman. Within its membership and Council are a number of the UK’s foremost aviation and aerospace companies and organisations. Membership of the Aviation Club and / or the Air League includes Airbus, Boeing, Rolls Royce, CFM International, British Airways, Emirates, Bombardier and CASCO, as well as a number of leading members of the UK Parliament.
His practical knowledge as an instrument rated fixed wing (aeroplane) pilot, a qualified rotary (helicopter) pilot, and his regular flying, both in the UK and abroad, is an invaluable addition to his skills when involved in aviation and aerospace matters professionally.
John’s sports law experience is over many years and covers areas of law including judicial review, public law, planning, property and environmental law including noise controls, public entertainment licensing, criminal and tort law involving nuisance and trespass, footpaths and rights of way, as well as most recently the obtaining of injunctions against ticket touts. He was also counsel in a Court of Appeal case representing the Aga Khan concerning the doping of a horse called Alysia.
His clients include a number of Premier Division Football Clubs (Arsenal, Chelsea, Derby County, Sunderland and others), Rugby (RFU Twickenham), Jockey Club Racecourses (Cheltenham Racecourse), Newbury Racecourse, Weatherby Racecourse, government departments (Department of Transport on a number of projects affecting sports facilities) many local authorities (Bromley Borough Council, Middlesborough Council, Newbury District Council/ West Berks Council), Reading Borough Council, Sheffield City Council, Southampton City Council, as well as educational establishments including Durham University, Harrow School among a number of others.
Examples of recent sports law cases (October 2018) include representing Jockey Cub Racecourses in successfully obtaining a ground breaking injunction to prevent touts selling tickets at Cheltenham Racecourse when as a result there were no touts selling tickets at the next meeting on Racecourse land.
He advises Jockey Club Racecourses on general legal matters in particular at Cheltenham as well as concerning their other 15 racecourses in relation to advertising, planning, development, health and safety and crowd control, entertainment licensing and building contract matters.
He is advising Harrow School in their planning application (currently on appeal to the Secretary of State) for a £180m sports and science development on land partly in the Green Belt at Harrow-on-the-Hill, including the first time a Community Use Agreement has been proposed for some 1300 hours of use of the sports facilities. He has successfully advised the owners and developers of the indoor Tennis Dome at Dukes Meadows Chiswick in the Metropolitan Green Belt in obtaining permanent planning permission.
He has been counsel advising on the £mm redevelopment of Chelsea FC stadium at Chelsea, the Arsenal Emirates Stadium, Derby County FC stadium and academy in the Green Belt, Sunderland FC Stadium of Light and academy in the Green Belt, RFU Twickenham Stadium redevelopment of the South Stand and public entertainment licensing (music concerts and events).
John is a recommended leader in Chambers & Partners, Legal 500 and Legal Experts for Aviation, Planning and Environmental Law.
He was awarded Acquisition International UK Aviation Law QC of the Year 2012/2013.
Recommended leader in Planning Law and Aviation Law:
“He is a highly experienced advocate and specialist in aviation and planning issues” (2018)
“He is great to get advice from, as he’s very responsive and considered, but more commercial than the average silk” (2018).
“His technical nous enables him to tackle complex cases, whether they are in relation to engineering, environmental or compulsory purchase complications.” (2018)
“Knowledgeable and tactically aware, particularly on CPO matters” (2017)
“Has a good grasp of the issues and provides excellent advice on tactics and procedures.” (2017)
“A real expert in planning and aviation law; he is very impressive on that and on the crossover between the two areas” (2016)
“He thinks outside the box and challenges himself, clients and others to think in a different way which is refreshing” (2015)
“an impressive lateral thinker who offers innovative legal and commercial solutions” and is “great with clients.” (2012).
“outstanding … [he] is an impressive lateral thinker who offers innovative legal and commercial solutions” (2011)
“an excellent silk-particularly when it comes to cross- examining and a really superb team player” (2010)
“generates acclaim for his client-friendly attitude and nose for the best strategy… [he is a] terrier in court and really quick on his feet” (2009)
“(he) is particularly rated for his fantastic knowledge of airports and aircrafts-related work, he is a master of planning law tactics who is very good at managing clients expectations. Diplomatic and effective in style” (2008)
“an incisive decision-maker who inspires confidence within clients” (2008)
Local Government Law:
“He has great clarity of thought and displays enthusiasm for his cases.” (2014)
“Reasonable in terms of both his fee and his approach, he really takes the time to try and understand what it is the client wants to achieve.” (2014)
“robust yet user-friendly approach” (2010)
“his advice on planning and environmental law is particularly prized” (2009)
Recommended leader in Aviation Law:
“Recommended for his airport development expertise” (2010 and 2011)
“a heavy hitter” (2017)
“He provides robust and strategic advice, which provides clear guidance.” (2017)
“Major infrastructure projects, airport noise and pollution controls are his forte” (2016)
“An innovative and creative problem solver” (2015)
“very enthusiastic and can think his way through complex problems to provide very practical outcomes” (2011)
“a results-driven focus” (2010)
“very impressive environmental specialist” (2008)
“Recommended for his expertise in the aviation sector and his wider industry knowledge” (2017)
“There is nobody stronger for issues surrounding major infrastructure projects” (2016)
“A very experienced practitioner” (2015)
“(he is) able to think outside the box and come up with approaches to tackle novel and unusual issues” (2011)
“good for no-holds-barred planning appeals, especially in the retail sector” (2008)